![]() Indeed what I was trying to show was that the folder tree corresponds to a non-scan situation, whereas I twice loaded scan data from 99% on as some sort of "test checkpoint" and twice over, the strange behavior repeated itself and the window just got back to the scan menu again, without showing anything new in the file explorer. Thank God it was not just me ! thanks for your reply. Note the absence of a dedicated \"node\" at the bottom of the folder tree that should appear showing the \"scan results\" from the partition. (the right-side tab was the manual file explorer opening that doesn't show anything).Įxplorer status post-scan. Should I open the drive on the left pane, I get a non-scanned drive, period. Is there something utterly obvious that I'm somehow missing here by some incredible event ? It is the first time in my life that I find myself stuck at such a fundamental level of a given software's function, it is plain crazy and I admit I fell quite ashamed.Īnyone with ideas ? I attached the basic scan page that I get sent back to upon scan completion. I'm simply sent back to the "start scan" option page, and no luck by trying to manually open up the scanned drive : all I get is a non-scanned drive where I only get my existing file. Instead, in my case, at the end of a successful scan, the end of operation is logged, the notification pane at the top-right blinks and confirms there were no issues, and then, nothing, nada. And this is basically the expected behavior from any kind of recovery software considering it is *the* core function and goal of its use. Indeed here I hit a damn wall after completing a 11-hour scan with that soft.Reason ? well, simple : when the scan complete, the software does not open up any explorer window containing a dedicated storage point to browse found files, like it is mentioned in every tutorial and piece of documented I could. ![]() Now I feel like a complete amateur, ignorant on basic interfaces, and like a totally inapt person at understanding even the simplest user-level software design and ergonomics, even though I've studied and work in IT myself, been through countless different types of interfaces and softwares for decades, ranging from Qbase to Emulators and video Authoring tools. I've been told that UFS Explorer can sometimes yield significantly better results so I thought giving it an ultimate try and salvage anything I can.īut I'm bewildered as to my inability at making even basic use of UFS Explorer. Yet, many files are still missing, approx 20 to 30% of what I've searched so far, for whatever reason since I can guarantee none of the data was overwritten since the incident. with Fix – de!ĭownload UFS Explorer Professional Recovery 9.So I have been making steady progress in recovering an increasingly significant amount of my terabytes of lost data (750 files comprised of mkv and mp4 files wiped out due to the dumbest misclick of my geeky life 3 weeks ago, that I already described in lengths on another thread of that sub a week ago), thanks to mainly using R-Studio that I got knowledge of thanks to direct recommendations gleaned here, for which I am very much grateful. Unique utility to analyse and virtually reconstruct the RAID storage complex.ĭownload UFS Explorer Professional Recovery 10. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |